I was wondering if anyone thinks this is reasonable:
I have brand new Suzuki 300 since August 2014. All good til about 80+ hours when it has started “making oil”-fuel is getting into oil. Mobile mechanic comes out says he thinks he heard misfire and changed plugs and oil to see if that would fix it. Only few more hours and oil level is way up. Now at dealer but same mechanic, does leakdown test and tells me cylinder 6 was “a little high” but regional Suzuki tech responsible for deciding if something is warranty issue tells mechanic there is no defect, wants him to decarbonize engine and for me to “run it hard” (there has been hinting that I don't run it hard enough, which I think is total BS). This work is being done as I write. So both attempts to fix so far out of my pocket. I am furious and think I am being shafted and getting very poor customer service from Suzuki and maybe my mechanic too. He says he tried to convince regional Suzuki guy but that he does not feel there is defect (mind you never laid eyes on motor).
Is this reasonable to folks with motor knowledge and the warranty business?
Thanks for you help and advice.
I have brand new Suzuki 300 since August 2014. All good til about 80+ hours when it has started “making oil”-fuel is getting into oil. Mobile mechanic comes out says he thinks he heard misfire and changed plugs and oil to see if that would fix it. Only few more hours and oil level is way up. Now at dealer but same mechanic, does leakdown test and tells me cylinder 6 was “a little high” but regional Suzuki tech responsible for deciding if something is warranty issue tells mechanic there is no defect, wants him to decarbonize engine and for me to “run it hard” (there has been hinting that I don't run it hard enough, which I think is total BS). This work is being done as I write. So both attempts to fix so far out of my pocket. I am furious and think I am being shafted and getting very poor customer service from Suzuki and maybe my mechanic too. He says he tried to convince regional Suzuki guy but that he does not feel there is defect (mind you never laid eyes on motor).
Is this reasonable to folks with motor knowledge and the warranty business?
Thanks for you help and advice.
Comment